The Role of the Duffy Blood Group Antigens in Renal Transplantation and Rejection. A Mini Review.

Finding a compatible donor for kidney transplant candidates requires overcoming immunological barriers such as human leukocyte antigens (HLA) compatibility and ABO compatibility. Emerging data suggest a role for red blood cell antigens (RCA) in renal transplant outcomes. The incidence of RCA alloimmunization is high in chronically transfused individuals, such as end stage renal disease patients, but whether antibodies to RCA can mediate renal graft rejection remains debatable. The Duffy blood group antigens (Fy) has been shown to be expressed in the kidney, among other tissues. There are some data to suggest that donor-recipient Fy mismatches may increase the risk for chronic allograft damage and that anti-Fy antibodies may be involved in renal graft rejection, however, while it is routine to screen renal transplant candidates for ABO antigens, detailed RCA phenotyping of the donor kidney is not routinely tested. In this paper, we review the current data on the role of Fy in renal transplantation and discuss the potential mechanisms of its biological function.

Utilizing proficiency testing survey data to create advanced educational content: the virtual crossmatch challenge model.

Proficiency testing (PT) surveys include data from laboratories across the world and are ideal for creating advanced educational content, beyond just consensus grading. Educational challenges provide a unique opportunity to probe common laboratory practices and risk assessment, especially in cases where there is no "analyte" tested. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility evaluation between donor and recipient pairs has been traditionally assessed using T-cell and B-cell physical crossmatches. However, advancements in our ability to identify and characterize HLA antibodies using solid phase assays, in combination with changing deceased donor allocation schemes and improved HLA typing, have shifted the paradigm from performing physical crossmatches to the use of the virtual crossmatch (VXM). VXM is a compatibility assessment relying on the interpretation of pre-transplant HLA laboratory data and as such, it is not an "analyte". However, VXM results are used in clinical decision-making. The VXM assessment depends on patient characteristics as well as laboratory and transplant center practices but must ensure safe transplantation outcomes while maintaining equity in access to transplantation. In this manuscript, we describe the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI) PT Educational VXM Challenge, as a model for creating educational content using PT survey data. We discuss the different components of the VXM Challenge and highlight major findings and learning points acquired from ASHI VXM Challenges performed between 2018-2022, such as the lack of correlation between the VXM and the physical crossmatch in the presence of low level donor-specific antibodies (DSA), or when the DSA were aimed against donor alleles that are not present on the antibody panel, and in the presence of an antibody to a shared eplet. Finally, we show that the VXM Educational Challenge serves as a valuable tool to highlight the strengths and pitfalls of the VXM assessment and reveals differences in testing and result interpretation among participating HLA laboratories.

Discrepancy Analysis between Histology and Molecular Diagnoses in Kidney Allograft Biopsies: A Single-Center Experience.

Histology diagnosis is essential for the monitoring and management of kidney transplant patients. Nowadays, the accuracy and reproducibility of histology have been criticized when compared with molecular microscopy diagnostic system (MMDx). Our cohort included 95 renal allograft biopsies with both histology and molecular diagnoses. Discrepancies between histology and molecular diagnosis were assessed for each biopsy. Among the 95 kidney allograft biopsies, a total of 6 cases (6%) showed clear (n = 4) or borderline (n = 2) discrepancies between histology and molecular diagnoses. Four out of the six (67%) were cases with pathologically and clinically confirmed active infections that were diagnosed as mild to moderate T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) with MMDx. Two cases showed pathological changes that were not sufficient to make a definitive diagnosis of active rejection via histology, while MMDx results showed antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). In addition, there were six cases with recurrent or de novo glomerular diseases diagnosed only via histology. All other biopsy results were in an agreement. Our results indicate that histology diagnosis of kidney allograft biopsy is superior to molecular diagnosis in the setting of infections and glomerular diseases; however, MMDx can provide helpful information to confirm the diagnosis of active ABMR.

Laparoscopic to robotic living donor nephrectomy: Is it time to change surgical technique?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore differences in outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (LDN). METHODS: This study compared robotic and laparoscopic surgical techniques for live donor nephrectomies in 153 patients at a single centre. RESULTS: Left nephrectomies were more common in both groups, but with no significant difference between the groups (76.6% vs. 77.6%, p = 0.88). The robotic donor nephrectomies (RDN) group experienced significantly less blood loss (60 vs. 134 mL, p < 0.01), but warm ischaemia time was similar between groups (3.2 vs. 3.7 min, p = 0.54).The RDN group had decreased subjective pain scores (3.54 vs. 4.21, p = 0.04) and shorter length of hospitalisation (2.22 vs. 3.04 days, p < 0.01).There were also fewer complications in the RDN than the LDN group (4 vs. 8, p = 0.186). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that RDN is a safe and alternative to LDN. Decreased blood loss and hospital stays and fewer complications may reflect decreased tissue manipulation with robotic assistance.

Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation From Donors With Acute Kidney Injury: Realities and Costs.

OBJECTIVES: Transplant of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury has shown favorable outcomes. We investigated the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with deceased donors who developed acute kidney injury before organ procurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of recipients from January 2016 to December 2021 in a single center. Outcomes in recipients of kidney grafts from donors with and without acute kidney injury were compared. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 40 months. Our study included 129 (34%) kidneys transplanted from donors with acute kidney injury and 251 (66%) kidneys from donors without acute kidney injury. Delayed graft function rate in recipients was 33% in the acute kidney injury group and 25.5% in the group without acute kidney injury (P = .099). Readmission rate at 30 days was significantly higher among recipients of kidneys with acute kidney injury compared with recipients of kidneys without acute kidney injury (45% vs 33.5%; P = .02). The mean overall costs of transplant in the acute kidney injury group were comparable to the group without acute kidney injury ($253 865 vs $253 611; P = .97). The acute rejection rate was comparable between the 2 groups (4% in both groups; P = .96). Delayed graft function rate was increased with increased stage of acute kidney injury (18% stage 1, 45% stage 2, 36% stage 3; P = .03). However, the overall length of hospital stay and costs were comparable among recipients of different stages of acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that kidney transplants from donors with acute kidney injury have early and late outcomes comparable to kidney transplants from donors without acute kidney injury. Allografts from donors with acute kidney injury can be used safely and can expand the donor pool in kidney transplant without increasing perioperative resource utilization.

Development of de novo donor-specific antibodies in renal transplant recipients with BK viremia managed with immunosuppression reduction.

BACKGROUND: Reduction of immunosuppression (IS) upon detection of Polyomavirus (BK) viremia is widely used to prevent BK virus nephropathy. This retrospective case-control study assesses the frequency of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in renal transplant recipients with IS modulation due to BK viremia and the associated risk of antibody mediated rejection. METHODS: Our cohort included recipients of kidney transplantation between 2007 and 2017 with clinical, HLA antibody, and biopsy data. BK positivity was defined as viremia >10 000 c/ml or biopsy proven BK nephropathy. A total of 190 BK cases matched our inclusion criteria, each case was matched with two controls based on gender, donor type, and transplant within 1 year (N = 396). RESULTS: Despite lower number of HLA antigen mismatches (mean = 3.5 vs. 4.4, p < .001), dnDSA rates were higher in BK cases than in control group (22.1% vs. 13.9%, p = .02), with the majority detected following IS reduction for BK infection, and arising earlier posttransplant compared with no BK infection (294d vs. 434d, p < .001). Antibody mediated rejection rates were similar between cases and controls (8.9% and 8.3%, respectively), but rejection was more likely to occur earlier posttransplant in the BK cases (354d vs. 602d, p = .03). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a link between IS reduction and the generation of dnDSA and/or rejection, supporting close monitoring for DSA in patients with reduced IS due to BK infection given their increased risk to develop dnDSA.

Is Salvage of a Kidney Graft Possible as a Result of Hyperacute Rejection Immediately After Kidney Transplantation?

Hyperacute rejection is a rare complication of renal transplantation. It is mainly caused by preformed human leukocyte antigen antibodies and can lead to the loss of the transplanted kidney. Renal transplantation is a highly beneficial treatment for people with end-stage renal disease, greatly improving their quality of life. However, antibody-mediated rejection is a significant challenge for the long-term survival of transplanted kidneys. An 18-year-old male with nephrotic syndrome, who underwent bilateral renal nephrectomy due to severe proteinuria, received a living donor kidney. Pretransplant panel reactive antibodies were low. Cytotoxic T- and B-cell and non-HLA cross-match was negative. The graft became cyanotic and mottled within half an hour of transplantation. Allograft was quickly extracted, and a biopsy showed hyperacute rejection. The patient was treated with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and eculizumab. The graft was successfully re-implanted after 18 hours. Further treatment included additional sessions of plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, eculizumab, T-cell-depleting agent, and immunosuppressive therapy. Serum creatinine became stable, and renal biopsy after one month demonstrated intact parenchyma with no inflammation or fibrosis. This case highlights the critical importance of promptly removing the transplanted kidney and using aggressive immunotherapy to save renal allografts in cases of hyperacute rejection.

Identification of a DRB1*04:07-DRB4*01:03:01:02N haplotype in a native American individual.

The DRB4*01:03:01:02N null allele is predominantly associated with the HLA-DRB1*07-DQB1*03:03 haplotype. Several recent reports demonstrated a less frequent association of DRB4*01:03:01:02N with DRB1*04 carrying haplotypes in different populations. The ability to identify the presence of null alleles is extremely important in the setting of both solid organ transplants and hematopoietic cell transplants, and characterization of haplotypes carrying null alleles is crucial. In this paper, we report for the first time, an association of DRB4*01:03:01:02N null allele with a DRB1*04:07-DQB1*03:02 haplotype.

Tools for optimizing risk assessment in hematopoietic cell transplant - What can we get away with?

Unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is a critical modality to treat hematologic malignancies. The current objective of donor selection is to match donor and recipient at the HLA (human leukocyte antigen) peptide-binding region which should lower the risk of graft-versus-host disease. However, depending on the patient's ethnicity/race, finding a matched donor is challenging, especially for HLA-DPB1 which is due to the weak linkage disequilibrium between HLA-DPB1 and the other HLA class II loci. Recent evidence, on the molecular level, has shown that certain HLA mismatches carry lower clinical risk. More specifically, there is an increasing understanding of polymorphisms of the innate and adaptive immune systems and their impact on transplant outcomes, allowing us to expand our "toolkit" for optimization of donor selection in HCT. Therefore, in this review we discuss matching strategies based on comparing donor and recipient polymorphisms that may influence innate and adaptive immune response genes in allorecognition and the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in non-HLA genes that have the potential for providing additional tools to refine risk stratification.

Impact of SIRPα polymorphism on transplant outcomes in HLA-identical living donor kidney transplantation.

Signal-regulatory protein α (SIRPα), a polymorphic inhibitory membrane-bound receptor, and its ligand CD47 have recently been implicated in the modulation of innate immune allorecognition in murine models. Here, we investigate the potential impact of SIRPα donor-recipient mismatches on graft outcomes in human kidney transplantation. To eliminate the specific role of HLA-matching in alloresponse, we genotyped the two most common variants of SIRPα in a cohort of 55 HLA-identical, biologically-related, donor-recipient pairs. 69% of pairs were SIRPα identical. No significant differences were found between donor-recipient SIRPα-mismatch status and T cell-mediated rejection/borderline changes (25.8% vs. 25%) or slow graft function (15.8% vs. 17.6%). A trend towards more graft failure (GF) (23.5% vs. 5.3%, P = .06), interstitial inflammation (50% vs. 23%, P = .06) and significant changes in peritubular capillaritis (ptc) (25% vs. 0%, P = .02) were observed in the SIRPα-mismatched group. Unexpectedly, graft-versus-host (GVH) SIRPα-mismatched pairs exhibited higher rates of GF and tubulitis (38% vs. 5%, P = .031 and .61 ± .88 vs. 0, P = .019; respectively). Whether the higher prevalence of ptc in SIRPα-mismatched recipients and the higher rates of GF in GVH SIRPα-mismatched pairs represent a potential role for SIRPα in linking innate immunity and alloimmune rejection requires further investigation in larger cohorts.

The quest to decipher HLA immunogenicity: Telling friend from foe.

Molecular mismatch load analysis was recently introduced as a means for performing risk stratification following organ transplantation. However, although good correlation was demonstrated between molecular mismatch load and generation of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA), quite a few exceptions exist, and the underlying factors that define HLA immunogenicity remain unclear. Herein, we present a new paradigm to interrogate differences between molecular mismatches that lead to the generation of de novo DSA and those that do not (the 2MM1DSA cohort). Specifically, patients transplanted across 2 HLA-DQ mismatches, who formed de novo DSA only to one mismatch (foe) but not the other (friend), provide a unique environment in which patient-specific factors that affect the immune response other than immunogenicity, such as infection and immunosuppression, can be controlled for. It further permits focusing on mismatches uniquely exhibited by the de novo DSA allele, rather than mismatches shared by both DSA and non-DSA alleles. This concept paper illustrates several examples, highlights the need for center-specific or population-specific cutoff values for posttransplant risk stratification, and mostly argues that if there is no direct correlation between molecular mismatch load and immunogenicity, then molecular mismatch load must not be adopted as an approach for equitable organ allocation.

Dual function of polycomb group proteins in differentiated murine T helper (CD4+) cells.

BACKGROUND: Following antigen recognition, naive T helper (Th; CD4+) cells can differentiate toward one of several effector lineages such as Th1 and Th2; each expressing distinctive transcriptional profiles of cytokine genes. These cytokines eventually instruct the strategy of the immune response. In our search for factors that propagate the transcriptional programs of differentiated Th cells, we previously found that Polycomb group (PcG) proteins, which are known as epigenetic regulators that maintain repressive chromatin states, bind differentially the signature cytokine genes. Unexpectedly, their binding to the Ifng (Interferon-g) in Th1 cells and Il4 (Interleukin-4) in Th2 cells, was correlated with transcriptional activation. Therefore, in this study we aimed to determine the functional role of PcG proteins in the regulation of the expression of the signature cytokine genes. METHODS: PcG proteins were knocked down in primary and established murine Th cells using transduction of lentiviruses encoding short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) directed to Mel-18, Ezh2, Eed and Ring1A, representative of two different PcG complexes. The chromatin structure and the binding activity of PcG proteins and transcription factors at the Ifng promoter were assessed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays. RESULTS: Downregulation of PcG proteins was consistent with their function as positive regulators of the signature cytokine genes in primary and established Th1 and Th2 cells. Moreover, the PcG protein Mel-18 was necessary to recruit the Th1-lineage specifying transcription factor T-bet, and the T cell receptor (TCR)-inducible transcription factor NFAT1 to the Ifng promoter in Th1 cells. Nevertheless, our results suggest that PcG proteins can function also as conventional transcriptional repressors in Th cells of their known target the Hoxa7 gene. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support a model whereby the non-differentially expressed PcG proteins are recruited in a Th-lineage specific manner to their target genes to enforce the maintenance of specific transcriptional programs as transcriptional repressors or activators. Although our results suggest a direct effect of PcG proteins in the regulation of cytokine gene expression, indirect functions cannot be excluded.

The binding activity of Mel-18 at the Il17a promoter is regulated by the integrated signals of the TCR and polarizing cytokines.

We have previously shown that in differentiated T-helper (Th)1 and Th2 cells, polycomb group (PcG) proteins are associated differentially with the promoters of the signature cytokine genes. The correlation of the binding activity of PcG proteins with gene expression is unusual, since they are well known as epigenetic regulators that maintain transcriptional silencing. Here we show that in Th17 cells, the more phenotypically flexible Th lineage, the PcG proteins Mel-18 and less strikingly Ezh2 are associated differentially with the Il17a promoter. Using the RNAi approach, we found that Mel-18 and Ezh2 positively regulate the expression of Il17a and Il17f. The inducible binding of Mel-18 and Ezh2 at the Il17a promoter was dependent on signaling pathways downstream of the TCR. However, a continuous presence of TGF-ß, the cytokine that is necessary to maintain Il17a expression, was required to preserve the binding activity of Mel-18, but not of Ezh2, following restimulation. The binding of Mel-18 at the Il17a promoter was correlated with the recruitment of the lineage-specifying transcription factor RORγt. Altogether, our results suggest that in Th17 cells the TCR and polarizing cytokines synergize to modulate the binding activity of Mel-18 at the Il17a promoter, and consequently to facilitate Il17a expression.

Unconventional association of the polycomb group proteins with cytokine genes in differentiated T helper cells.

The cytokine transcription profiles of developing T helper 1 and T helper 2 cells are imprinted and induced appropriately following stimulation of differentiated cells. Epigenetic regulation combines several mechanisms to ensure the inheritance of transcriptional programs. We found that the expression of the polycomb group proteins, whose role in maintaining gene silencing is well documented, was induced during development in both T helper lineages. Nevertheless, the polycomb proteins, YY1, Mel-18, Ring1A, Ezh2, and Eed, bound to the Il4 and Ifng loci in a differential pattern. In contrast to the prevailing dogma, the binding activity of the polycomb proteins in differentiated T helper cells was associated with cytokine transcription. The polycomb proteins bound to the cytokine genes under resting conditions, and their binding was induced dynamically following stimulation. The recruitment of the polycomb proteins Mel-18 and Ezh2 to the cytokine promoters was inhibited in the presence of cyclosporine A, suggesting the involvement of NFAT. Considering their binding pattern at the cytokine genes and their known function in higher order folding of regulatory elements, we propose a model whereby the polycomb proteins, in some contexts, positively regulate gene expression by mediating long-distance chromosomal interactions.